Gross’s dream of capturing emissions at the tailpipe was far from a pipe dream. "It seemed crazy to me that we have all of these very rich sources of carbon dioxide coming out of vehicles and buildings, and we’re going to instead wait for that carbon dioxide to scatter into the atmosphere and then try to collect it again," he said. Remora’s trajectory started with a simple idea that Gross just couldn’t shake while he was a student at Yale University: capture carbon at the source. "If you’re going to do mobile source capture, you do it on trucks and you do it on fleets." Remora’s origins "Their core business model is entirely credible," said carbon removal expert Julio Friedmann, a senior research scholar at Columbia University. On the customer side, Remora has a long list of multibillion-dollar logistics corporations ( 16 and counting) that have signed up to pilot the technology on part of their fleets - including trucking companies Ryder, Werner, Arcbest and NFI Industries, as well as agribusiness giant Cargill. In August, Remora announced it had raised a $5.5 million seed round led by venture capital heavyweight Union Square Ventures, along with other major climate tech players such as Lowercarbon Capital, Y Combinator, First Round Capital, Neo Ventures and MCJ Collective. "It’s ready to go now, not a decade from now or a couple decades away."Īn impressive group of investors and customers has already bought into Remora’s vision. "That’s what’s exciting about this technology," said Paul Gross, Remora’s co-founder and chief executive officer. The company has been incorporated for less than a year, but it’s poised to install its first devices on commercial trucks at the start of 2022. That's why it’s invigorating to see a solution such as Remora, which reduces emissions from long-haul trucking by sucking up carbon dioxide directly from the tailpipe. ![]() In response to criticism of its Queensland carbon capture and storage trial, CTSCo has consistently stated that the project has been independently reviewed by the IESC, Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment (OGIA) and CSIRO as part of the environmental impact statement process.Climate tech solutions can sometimes seem vexingly distant on the horizon, but as climate impacts bear down hard, the urgency of the problem is palpable. The CSIRO has also published a report examining Australia's "significant geological storage potential" for the storage of waste CO2 "in geological basins", including the Great Artesian Basin. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) have acknowledged the role that carbon capture and storage can play as the world transitions away from burning fossil fuels. ![]() Mr Hamer has previously told the ABC that fluoride was common in the Great Artesian Basin and was relatively easily removed from and treated from a groundwater supply if needed. "It is important to note that the precipice groundwater at this location already contains the trace element fluoride, at levels six times above the safe drinking water level," he said. So should Australia's most significant underground water resource be used for food production or to store waste CO2? The carbon capture and storage project is a relatively small trial, in a very deep underground aquifer, and the Independent Expert Scientific Committee says "impacts are expected to be minimal and manageable in both the immediate and long term."īut with other carbon capture and storage projects reportedly being planned in the GAB, there are concerns about the precedent the CTSCo project might set. ![]() The company insists "it does not risk agricultural or town drinking water". Glencore says the project is "based on robust scientific fieldwork", but a report it commissioned found that even "food grade" CO2 could cause levels of lead and arsenic in the groundwater to rise to hundreds of times the safe drinking water guidelines. Queensland's Conservation Council oppose it, so do farmers and all the peak state and federal agriculture bodies, and even pro-coal MP Colin Boyce is against it. Coal giant Glencore is seeking approval to store waste carbon dioxide (CO2) from a Queensland carbon capture and storage project in a Great Artesian Basin aquifer, and it has fired up just about everyone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |